Tag Archives: muusikkous

TH rejects the notions of pop musicians’ childishness and their work as child’s play

Standard

Week 51


A musician will sink or swim with his or her musicianship.

Date: 14 Dec 2020
MotionTHR pop musicians’ penchant for childishness, as their work reminds one of child’s play
Role: Chair or 1st speaker (opp.)


Why isn’t pop-musicianship easy? On the one hand, it is a musician’s duty to play his or her instrument, in the moment and without a care, but also to tie those instances of play into ever growing, longer chains and sequences of austere seriousness. I will demonstrate with a train of thought, exactly how long this chain or train of obligations grows.

  1. A musician can not play only the catchiest, funniest or nicest part of the song (s)he has in his or her working memory, but (s)he has to play the whole song from beginning to end, with intros and codas and the whole ABCDABCDABCBCDADCBDABA structure of the song.
  2. A musician can not play only one hit song as the repertoire for his or her gig, but the gig needs to consist of 10 – 20 tunes that are atmospherically, rhythmically and stylistically different from each other, with the exception of some monotonous styles of genre music.
  3. A musician can not make a salable record with one song only but (s)he has to compile and compose the record of many new songs, of which only 1 or 2 may be cover songs attributed to other artists. Even then the arrangement needs to be new and unique. A full-length CD’s standard length is at least 10 but preferably 12 or 13 songs.
  4. Moreover, the praxis of the recording industry is that all of the material created in certain recording sessions is NOT to be released all together as the 1st and only edition. Sessions should ideally produce between 20 and 25 songs or tunes, so that the remaining ones could be later released as so-called B-sides to singles (even though singles no longer have B-sides) or as further, complementing material for so-called Deluxe or Remastered editions of hot CDs, typically released as an anniversary reprise of the original release (10, 15, 20, 25 or 30 years later).
  5. A musician is expected to tour the country or the continent or the world in conjunction with every released studio album, excluding other kinds of albums, such as acoustic retrospectives, compilations, EPs, live concert releases, remixed retrospectives and symphonic retrospectives. For this purpose, (s)he needs to put together a band, if we are talking about a solo performer, or if a band, to rehearse as such for an upcoming tour.
  6. On tours, gigs need to be played as planned from start to finish, so that people may get an experience of a lifetime. If some announced/promised gig must be cancelled for any reason, it should be compensated for in playing in the same place or town later on during the tour or further down the road.
  7. If a musician is called and invited to spontaneous (as opposed to personally contractual) appearances, such as the media’s broadcast music programmes or parties held in the immediate personal circle of the musician, (s)he is supposed to be able to play other music than his or her own normal repertoire and demonstrate a capacity for transformability, solo performance and spontaneous improvisation. In other words, on demand, (s)he is supposed to be able to step on to his or her discomfort zone.

Besides, traditionally a musician has been under pressure to juggle these concerns with three additional concerns of a private nature. (S)he has been presumed to handle “career demands” in addition to “common demands”. These other demands are:

  • Family problems arising from multiple partners consecutively or simultaneously, or multiple children with different partners complete with alimony demands
  • Financial issues arising from bad money management, lavish spending, unpaid taxes, untrustworthy managers or
  • Intoxicant abuse of either alcohol in superstandard quantities or ingestible, inhalable or injectable drugs and the health issues that ensue from out-of-control substance abuse.

Luckily, in recent years these extracurricular demands have decreased on a given musician, and today a pop musician can dodge this extra stress in living his or her life as close to a normal wage-earner as possible. Not doing it in the “old-school way” is not frowned upon anymore.

All of this accumulated pressure directed towards a single musician, in particular when we are talking about a key member in a band or a solo performer under one’s own name, adds up to be a mindlessly long legato note, stretching those legato arches from seven to ten times from bar to bar, so that the final note of duty or responsibility is very, very long. This implies that a good musician is a far cry from an ADD or ADHD case, or, as the motion’s wording suggests, a child. Rather, his or her best quality is an out-of-sight maturity, patience and superhuman sustainability, an ability to “sustain” a “note” (i.e. his or her whole career). It exceeds and transcends what is expected from a normal employee, grunt or officeholder within the scope of work.


Perustelu(t)/puolustelu(t): Puheenjohtajana minun pitää näyttää puolelleni mallia siitä, mille sotajalalle lähdetään. Puolustamme kohdettamme niillä välineillä, joita meillä on käytössämme. Käytämme mielikuvitustamme ja tietojamme kulttuurielämästä, joista ei ole puutetta. Jäljessäni tulevat voivat puhua vaikkapa järjestysmiesten ja valomiesten työllistämisestä tai siitä, miten popmuusikot ovat teini-iässä nuorelle ‘tärkeämpiä’ kuin omat vanhemmat.

THW put a ban on computer-aided match-making sites [of the musical kind]

Standard

Viikko 9


 

Date: Oct 19th, 2013
Motion: THW put a ban on computer-aided match-making sites [of the musical kind]
Role: PM (gov.)


In this speech, I’m going to discuss all the obstacles that there are to stop members of online bandmate-finding services from finding each other and collaborating. I joined one such service a decade ago, and it has been only downhill from then on. The service has yielded zilch when it comes to musical progress. I’m trying to come up with the reasons why.

It is not difficult to write an ad for the service or answer one. The problems only begin thereafter. The service abounds in ads for high-pitched, full-fledged heavy-rock vocalists a la Myles Kennedy, who are ready to rock out like Robert Plant. Talent shows seek out exactly the same kind of people. Ads for other kinds of musicians are fewer and farther in between. If you’re trolling for an accordion player, chances are that he is already playing in the ranks of the Eläkeläiset or is Kimmo Pohjola.

The first thing that you do not have in common with the fellow advertiser is your rendez-vous. Most likely (s)he will want to remain in his or her “home studio” and send you a half-finished demo outtake that you are supposed to fill in by what you are expert at, say, the bass guitar, or Fairlight synthesizer. You are then supposed to send the unfinished demo back with your contribution on it, so that you two never meet. Whether the demo goes anywhere is another matter entirely. You were collaborating, from work station to work station. You are a link in the global value-adding music-producing chain.

The second thing that you do not have in common with that other musician is time. Probably your mate on the other end of the modem line is busy working full-time, so that (s)he doesn’t make music even as a hobby but rather as a dream. (S)he decided that (s)he was going to make it by the time (s)he got to be 50, so (s)he still has to try, even every now and then or just once in a while. However, other preferences and preoccupations come first. Work, children, wife, relatives… All are relatively more meaningful than making music with some expendable outsiders. After all, stardom is only a matter of attitude and negotiation, so there is all the time in the world to get there.

The third thing that you do not have in common with the other bloke is that your tastes do not jell together. That other bloke is always one, two or three steps ahead of you in musical taste, because he borrows, buys and listens to music more than you do. There is always some obscure progressive-aggressive rock band out there, whose musical ideas he likes better than yours, whose latest record was better than the demo/record you never made and whose management of success has always been better than the success you never managed to achieve together.

Even though there is technically nothing wrong with musical match-making services of this kind, socially they only manage to attract exactly the kind of people who are utterly deluded and inhibited from meaningful social interaction and musical success of a discernible kind. One can keep coming to a service like that like a bullied youth keeps coming to the yard at recess, hoping to make friends.

If one wants to make it in music, there are two other options. One is talent shows of the prevalent sort, as shown on the TV. They lead to either humiliation or praise, but at least only little time gets wasted. The other option is to do it the old-fashioned way.


Kesto: 4 min 50 sek
Arvio: * * *. Puhe lähtee ennalta arvaamattomaan suuntaan, jos sen ottaa kirjaimellisesti otsikon mukaan ilman hakasulkeita. Tällöin muiden naamoille nousee närkästys, jos heidän täytyy peesata ensimmäistä puhujaa eivätkä he tee muistiinpanoillaan mitään. Omassa aiheessaan pysymällä puhe on kriittinen, kärkäs ja ytimekäs. Puhe on hauska. Jos siihen lisää sanat “tämä on satiiria” paikka paikoin, niin se tulee oikein hyvin ymmärretyksi.