Tag Archives: parinvalinta

THS relationship “projects” as an antivenom to Tinder culture

Standard

Week 16


Benchmark for Love.

Motion: THS relationship “projects” as an antivenom to Tinder culture
Role: Deputy Leader (gov.)


It seems that Tinder is not bringing about the desired change in how people perceive and receive each other in love. Tales about how it is a dreary place abound. From creepy dates to ghosting to hookup disappointments to photo disasters, the app is not living up to its promise as the cybermarket of human relationships. E.g. following statements have been made about it: “people in open relationships go on it but have to go undercover, because their mutual friends do not like it”, “there is a nagging feeling that someone better could always come along” and “there is a surprising amount of LONG-MARRIED people on Tinder, looking for semi-erotic playthings”. Tinder operates on the principle: Amator quasi piscis, nequam est nisi recens. I have a novel solution beyond Tinder and I am presenting it here. It could be termed love project or project love, whichever way around.

Project in the Past: Woman Takes on an Alcoholic
What I’m on about is that people should start dating people who are on a lower level than they themselves as a whole, as GPA human beings. People should take people on who represent a challenge, in the way a couple take on a challenge when they buy a flat that will necessitate a thorough renovation before it becomes habitable for them. In the past, what this referred to was when a salaried, working woman hooked up with an alcoholic in the hopes of making a decent man out of him. In theory, it is easy to transform an alcoholic. Put him in the bath and have his beard, hair and sideburns cut and give him a new set of clothing. Buy him aftershave and give him Eau de Toilette. A different creature would emerge after this makeover. The bigger challenge, nonetheless, would be to stop him from drinking and going back to his bad, old habits. Setting him up with a cup of coffee is not enough after years of hard drinking.

What caused people to chuckle and laugh was the success rate: it was often shockingly bad. Women could not turn alcoholics into BF’s, flames or married husbands. They were often forced to give up on the guy after a few days, weeks or months. What needs to be borne in mind is this: there needs to be something, some quality about the projected human that is better or on a higher level than in the upper-hand party. It is a prerequisite for the latter to have a right amount of motivation to push through.

Project Where Roles Reverse: Man Takes on an Oversensitive or Poorly Educated Woman
Women with alcoholics is just one tried example. Men could also take on projects. They could begin to hang out with a woman who was shy and timid around crowds, events and individuals. If the man persisted and took the woman out sufficiently, to ice-hockey rinks, opera and rock concerts, at times ready to back off if she felt the need to flee, he might be able to transform the woman into a sociable being who actually liked to be at the centre of things. Likewise, the man, if and when educated at a seat of higher learning, could try to turn a woman with just a vocational school behind her into a Lady, who knew about etiquette, norms, theories and other stuff that is taught in an academic environment, something the man might have learnt decades or years ago, complementing also his sophistication thereafter.

And it would not have to stop there. Roles could be reversed. A young woman could date a so-called hikikomori or NEET, which means a young man who has given up on his hopes to become a taxpayer and retreated to his mancave at home with his parents, who’d take care of his material needs. The drawbacks of a hikikomori would be obvious to a girl, but the takeaway was that a hikky is usually intelligent and knows his way around IT, his main getaway. His company could be highly rewarding if the woman was endowed with the kind of mindset that appreciates thin recluses who are smart. Incels, on the other hand, it would be advisable to stay clear of.

Pros: They Are Far Easier to Get and Society Improves One (or Two) Individual(s) at a Time
What’s gratifying about choosing projects is that these people would not put up a fight in getting to know them. Few wanted them anyway. If someone did, the road would have been paved. When the better-equipped worked his or her magic, life of the other party would begin to improve. That would have a positive effect primarily on the individual and secondarily on society. And, if the initially stronger one persisted in the relationship, his or her life could also potentially be transformed in the form of a relationship that was based on something else than greed, jealousy and superficiality.

If people began to go down this path more and more often, Tinder might begin falling out of favour. Soon, one could only find black widows, catfishers, con artists, fitness queens, narcissists, pervoes and sociopaths on Tinder, something we have suspected all along, and better still, the app could become a veritable Rogues Gallery for the police to utilise, if and when only unsavoury people chose to remain there.


Perustelu(t)/puolustelu(t). On tärkeää, etten tyhjennä pajatsoa toiminnallani. Minun pitää jättää poletteja myös muille joukkuetovereilleni. Jätän yhdelle mahdollisuuden väittää, että Tinder on täynnä kaupallisia prostituoituja ja seuralaisneitejä tuhmien setien lisäksi. En siis mainitse siitä. En myöskään mainitse MadTV:n sketsiä Lowered Expectations, joka käsittelee VHS-kasettien aikaista deittausympäristöä, missä pärjäsi aina paremmin, jos ei “toivonut liikoja”.

THC getting a life partner a matter of great discernment

Standard

Week 15


NB. C stands for Considers

Love in old and young age asks for a kindred lover.

Motion: THC getting a life partner just a matter of going out
Role: Leader (opp.)


I was recently at a train pullover spot. I had failed to get out in time for my actual station, so I stayed until the next stop, right in the middle of nowhere, where the conductor let me out and advised me to take the next oncoming, opposite-direction train home – for free, without a punitive charge. At the stop, I eyed a young couple who were about to board that same train. They were between 17 and 27, and they looked much alike. Neither was better looking than the other. Like with a lot of couples, the girl (or woman) made some anxious questions or remarks, and the boy (or man) reassured her with his responses. They were very similar to each other, despite the gender difference.

Anyone Can Get a Partner
One of the delusions that people today have is that they have to pass the bar in terms of some imaginary relationship pole-vaulting competition. They would have to be alike Mr. Armand Duplantis or Ms. Wilma Murto in terms of the challenge. Then they were fit for courtship, engagement and marriage, potentially children. That is so untrue. Just as there are apex specimens of a human being, there are also average people, “losers” and mediocrities. The thing is that an apex specimen is not interested in a plain Jane, and a plain Shane should not set his sights on a unparallelled female. They could go over the fence at its lowest for them.

The first thing to evaluate is this: Evaluate how good-looking you are for real. The face is the most important part of your body in that respect, but the body in itself is not immaterial. Ugly faces are less ugly, if the body shape is great; cute faces are uglier if they come with too much bodily fat and flesh or some other thing that makes the whole less savoury. Do not overestimate or underestimate yourself. Your next goal is that you try to match your body and face with someone who is approximately as average-, bad- or good-looking. Moreover, it needs to be born in mind that women are allowed to be a little better-looking, with longer and stronger hair than men, and they would still be considered equals.

Couples Are a Matter of Pair Formation
It is important that somehow the pair look alike. They should have a kindred body, face, posture and potentially other features, on a granular level. On a graphic level, they can be different, because they also need to complement each other. For instance, if the woman in question is short, it is helpful if the man is taller as he can reach for things that the woman cannot, and this is a matter of pragmatics, not of metaphorics.

Similarity in appearance is important, because it ensures that the constituent parts of the pair a) seem to deserve each other and that b) other people are not going to intervene in their relationship while they are together. When there is greater disparity in terms of looks, the pair would develop self-doubts about their relationship – and also attract “praying mantes” (🕷) who tried to prise the better-looking party apart from the relationship. People leave alone self-secure pairs that look alike while they are together.

Socratic Self-Matching and Self-Reflection Is the Key to Pair Formation
So, it seems that one can get a pair for oneself, if one can discern in a crowd who is the most alike oneself in terms of quality of looks and similarity in other ways. The similarity does not have to be more than skin-deep. Deeper differences may work out for the couple. The woman may be verbally oriented, while the man is visually oriented. The woman may be extroverted, while the man is introverted. And so on, etc. What underlies this is that a person needs to first know herself or himself in order to be able to find someone else. One needs to run a thorough SWOT check on oneself and list one’s parameters. This applies first and foremost to appearance and physicality and secondarily to one’s other characteristics and qualities. One needs to be Socratic in the classic sense of the adjective and live according to “Nosce te ipsum” in order to succeed in pair formation.

So, I would say that one cannot get a partner in just going out and grabbing hold of one of the first ten people that one encounters. It is not as easy as that. Most of the avenues have to be tried. Many contacts have to be used. A lot of networks have to be exhausted. Then, if all goes according to plan, one has a life partner who is not going to disappear in the first storm that brews.


Perustelu(t)/puolustelu(t)Koska parinetsintä on nyt korkealla agendalla, esitän omasta puolestani oman näkemykseni siitä, miten se onnistuu. Puheessa on lievää huojuntaa, eikä se välttämättä ole täysin vakuuttava. Tämä johtuu siitä, etten itsekään ole varma siitä, riittävätkö vastaavat ulkonäöt parinvalinnan perusteeksi vai pitäisikö vastaavien varakkuuksien kohdata. Siitä voidaan kuitenkin hyvin kiistellä itse väittelyn aikana.

THC this one Reality TV show as actually intellectually rewarding viewing

Standard

 


Week 19


NB. C stands for Commends

Motion: THC this one Reality TV show as actually intellectually rewarding viewing
Role: Member/MP (gov.)


I am not a fan of reality TV, but there is one show that I actually like to watch. It’s called Dinner Date. In it, one single person is looking for love among 5 dates pre-selected by the production company. Out of them, (s)he chooses 3 with whom (s)he will have a dinner domestically cooked by the selected contestant. In the end, one will be chosen for a dinner eating out that the pair have to pay out of their own pocket. The production company pays for microwave meals for the losers, complete with a small 18.7–25 cl bottle of wine.

Choose According to Your Type
The fun part of following the show comes from trying to figure out what choices I myself as a viewer would make instead of the entrant. The first choice is “Whom would I pick out of the bunch of 5 to begin with?”. The answer lies in your own “type”. What is your type? You need to rack your brain. You’d pick people based on it. So, in this case you would choose 3 people out of 5 based on your personal history and what kind of a bar you set for your consorts. If only nil, one or two of them meets your criteria – based on just looks, name, occupation, origin and what they tell you – you have to change, complement or lower your expectations so that 3 people get chosen in the end.

You should only choose episodes that correspond to your orientation when it comes to dating companions. So, if you are a straight man, you should go for the straight episodes where the man chooses from women or the lesbian episodes where a woman chooses from women, so that the object of your affections is the right one, even if with a “twist”. That way your head is screwed right and tight between the choices you have to make. There is little point in making other kinds of choices.

Combinations per Combinatorics
The next thing is that there are in total 10 different combinations whereby a person may pick 3 people out of 5 (for instance, I, II and III, with IV and V left out). What you can do is that you pick a suite of ten things and name each of the combinations after one of them. That way, you can compare how the entrant chose and how you would choose between the contestants. A branch of mathematics that deals with alternatives like this is called combinatorics.

You should have a personal suite of ten to make it just your own. I give one example that you could use, even if it’s impersonal. It’s the planets in the solar system. Their number is eight, but you may augment them with the sun and the moon. You could name all the different ten combinations after Mercury, Venus, the Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, the sun and the moon of the Earth. For instance, you can say to yourself that “my choice was earthbound or Tellurian, but (s)he chose for herself or himself in a Martian or Neptunian way.”

Final Choice
What if left is the final choice; comparing how the entrant chose with how you would have chosen if you had been in his or her place. Sometimes you would feel a kindred spirit and similarity in your choice over final date – but sometimes you would feel that if that other person went out with that person you did not like that much, that better option was available to you and only you.

I agree with most people that most reality TV is dumb, heartbreaking, sick and silly, but that there are also shows that grab your attention and build up an “agility course” for you to follow and mentally play with. Dinner Date is one such show – at least to me. Even if I agree that most of it is unsalvageable, some reality TV can be viewed and experienced as “head massage”. There is that one “black swan” that makes all those other “swans” flock together in deferential submission.


Perustelu(t)/puolustelu(t). Ainoat tosi-tv-ohjelmat, jotka koskaan ovat liikuttaneet minua ovat olleet brittiläisiä. Niitä on noin 1:100 suhteessa kaikkiin tosi-tv-tuotantoihin. Puolustan omasta puolestani yhtä tuotantoa ja niin pitäisi tehdä puoleni kaikkien edustajien.

THP a perennial partner to singlehood

Standard

Week 16


NB. P stands for Prefers

Choose a partner, so that you do not have to hug a tree, or yourself.

Date: 19 Apr 2022
Motion: THP a perennial partner to singlehood
Role: Member (gov.)


These days, being single is so common that it is reclaiming what was the domain of pairs or couples in the past, with or without children. Students, for instance, seek one-room studios for themselves as their preferred mode of living, without space for a significant other or flatmates — let alone children — whereas in the past, students chose more social and roomier alternatives to live with and in. It is as if people knew that they are going to be alone. According to statistics, a million Finns live on their own among the adult population.

This is a deplorable development, and it would not have to be this way. There is nothing wrong with transitional singlehood, but the problems begin to arise when it is not a question of a transition but a bachelor(ette)s’ nation. At that point, the ills of singlehood are bound to raise their ugly head. Even so, I have good news to all singles out there. Being in a couple does not have to be about ❤💝 love 💙💞 in its own right. Love is a good spice, but as I am going to demonstrate in the following, the foundation of a pair can rest on things that are inherently something else.

Narrative
The problem with being single is that it does not produce a narrative for the individual himself or herself. When a person goes into a common-law marriage or marriage and has kids, the narrative emerges on its own weight. Having children ends the “irresponsible” phase of one’s life, watching children grow brings new, welcome elements into an adult’s life to offset the losses and finally, children and grandchildren are natural beneficiaries of one’s inheritance (as opposed to the state or one’s siblings or parents). That’s an arc, a narrative, a storyline, a synopsis of a life lived. A single does not have such a narrative, if going home from work and grabbing some Chinese takeaway day after day may be regarded as a narrative. Or watching countless motion pictures about other people’s lives. If it is a narrative, it is a bad narrative. It is repetitive. Undramatic.

Oxytocin Singlehood is bad because there is no guarantee that a single person will receive enough oxytocin during his or her adult life. It could be compared to one of the vitamins (A – E), even though it is a peptid hormone. It is necessary for wellbeing, and it is released in conjunction with living creatures, sometimes in talking to living things that one cares for (i.e. not a civil servant or a cash-register clerk). Oxytocin may be collected from one-night stands, but a single person needs to be very industrious and lucky to clock in the needed amount of partners to get the prescribed amount of oxytocin. Couples do not have to go through the same stress. They are each other’s source for the hormone. They get for free what singles get for a steep fee. Where people go wrong is when they figure that they can do without it.

Sharing the Household Costs
One pet peeve singles seem to have is that they perceive having a lower economical position compared with couples. When DINKs take care of their household, they share the mandatory costs. Singles pay everything out of one purse, not two. That one of them may cook for the other is a thorn in the side for a single, to whom no-one cooks except (s)he him- or herself and the Chinese cook. What singles do not understand is that the market-economy system cannot take their grievance or hang-up into account. Just as it is unlawful to charge more from an obese traveller aboard a plane (on the grounds of taking up “two seats”), it is not lawful to give residential discounts to persons living alone. I told earlier on that being in a couple does not have to be about love in itself. It can be about just the numbers. One is not obliged to love another person one lives under the same roof with, as long as there is enough civil tolerance for the person. Living as a pair could be just an economical arrangement. But for the oxytocin part, it would be better, if there was love involved.

A digital society has vastly increased the chances of finding one’s significant other. On top of the digital means come all the traditional means of finding a partner. What is ingenious about the digital means is that most of the “duds” are out of the mix. When one approaches a random, promising-looking person with romance in mind on a park bench, chances are that the punter is asexual, differently oriented, a foreign tourist, not interested in dates for the time being or spoken for. If all “handicaps” had an even share, maybe only 16 % of those traditionally approached might be interested in a hook-up, based on a chance encounter. The odds would be depressingly low, which may correspond with how people perceive that reality. In digital surroundings, 94 % of the people are there because they want to find someone. (The rest may be catfishers or someone has put them there as a revenge.)

I do not want to demonise all singlehood. Some of it is acceptable and recommendable, such as the kind encountered when moving into adulthood from one’s original family home or the kind experienced after a partner’s passing. Then, it is meant to be transitory, a rite of passage. The problem is that the rite of passage often becomes a chronic malaise. And when enough people suffer from it, it becomes normalised. On this side, we fear that in the future singlehood would have a similar status as a fatty liver, type-B diabetes or unemployment. When enough people have it, it becomes normalised, even if it is a far cry from the ideal state of things.


Perustelu(t)/puolustelu(t): Vaikka vastapuolelta löytyy väkisinkin paljonkin sinkkuelämän puoltajia, sen kimppuun hyökkääminen on myös kaikkea muuta kuin mahdotonta. Vastaan yksin II tiimin julkisesta, uudesta osuudesta, siinä missä parini tekee tiivistelmän. Aiheeksi I tiimille kävisi esimerkiksi adoptoimisen helpottuminen, kun on paljon pariskuntia tarjolla, tai eläkemaksujen maksamisen muuttuminen mahdottomaksi tulevaisuudessa. Heillä olisi siis täten perheoikeudellinen, sosiologinen tai taloudellinen pohja omalle ulosannilleen.

THB that marital couples may be formed based on what the candidates say or sing

Standard

Week 34


 

This is the first blogpost after the break. Because there is still some summer left, this week’s post is a bit summerish, with summery characters and a breezy message, not dead serious.

 

Date: Aug 19th, 2019
Motion: THB that marital couples may be formed based on what the candidates say or sing
Role: Minister (gov.)


Dear Ladies & Gentlemen, Assemblage & Chair,

I have followed with semi-interest the career of Lana Del Rey (not real name). Everything started super-promisingly with the single “Video Games” at the beginning of this decade, the Onesies. Now Del Rey has been showcasing her talent on multiple LPs, whereafter I cannot help thinking that maybe she is just as important as an artist to us as the Smiths were in their prime at the time of her birth, in the mid-80’s. So far, she has released the longplays Born to Die, (also the enhanced Paradise edition), Ultraviolence, Honeymoon, Lust for Life and the forthcoming Norman F***ing Rockwell. Just like the Smiths, she creates numerous variations on a basic atmosphere that she puts dependably on new records that follow each other. Like the Smiths, she can include some earlier work on a newer record, for the sake of clarity or vanity, or just to please fans. Furthermore, we are talking about a protagonist who sings about the complexities of an emotional life from the viewpoint of a person who is capable of deep sentimentality. The songs are allusional by nature, if not literary, so they could be elaborated on in book circles or university courses.

Lest we forget, the releases of the Smiths were in turn, chronologically, The Smiths, Hatful of Hollow, Meat Is Murder, The Queen Is Dead, The World Won’t Listen, Louder Than Bombs, Strangeways Here We Come and Rank (live), coming out between 1983 and 1988. On those records, choicest cuts were, arguably, in alphabetical order, “Bigmouth Strikes Again”, “Girlfriend in a Coma”, “Half a Person”, “Panic”, “Shakespeare’s Sister”, “Stop Me If You Think You Have Heard This One Before” and “You Just Haven’t Earned It Yet, Baby”.

Moreover, the lead vocalist behind it all knows that (s)he is playing a role and having a mask, the private person behind which must be an almost similar private Romantic compared to the public Nostalgic. Both Del Rey and Morrissey pine for the same period of time, or epoch, which is the early 1950’s thru the late 1970’s, inasmuch as it represents modernism and the quintessential national spirit associated with it. These two do NOT worship the black-and-white era, which pulsated with more vigour until World War 2, but the whole transitional period from black-and-white to colour, before the advent of “mindless vulgar consumerism”. The era of the Marlboro (Wo)man.

What does come out of this? I think Morrissey and Del Rey should get married. I ground this on the following points:

Morrissey
Morrissey has often sung in his songs that he is pining for a woman, who “does not exist”, we assume, because his standards are so high for a potential flame that he can not possibly take seriously anybody EXCEPT a very bright young thing and a beauty. He has sung about this on so many occasions that we know he is serious about it, means it, and we now feel he should maybe redeem all that talk and all of that languour, lust, passion and yearning somehow. As for Del Rey’s eligibility; she is one in a billion; there are few others. The other few are all the other females who vie in the same category.

Del Rey
Del Rey is singing most of the time about a femme fatale who is out of her mind, whose private life is questionable and whose mental life is a mess and social life unbelievable. All of this would make sense if Morrissey was really her husband, regardless and because of his plausible and possible bi- or homosexuality. Also, Del Rey sings often about some mystical “Daddy”, which may be a reference to a generic male or boyfriend of the month, but who ought to be preferably some mature rake with amazing qualities. That would explain away the ambivalence and a plethora of seemingly implausible or impossible nuances in the lyrics of her songs. The truth COULD BE stranger than fiction (his and her lyrics combined), or the truth could “vie with” fiction for the “1st Prize”.

Physical Compatibility
The pair could be admirable. Del Rey has hit the ideal age for reproduction and Morrissey, unlike her female peers can still produce offspring, whether he wants to or not. Physically, Morrissey represents women’s favourite: dark, handsome, tall and tanned at request. Grey hairs of his should only be dyed away, but that is no big thing. Both talk each other’s birth language and their mental IQs are on a level of similar magnitude. That Morrissey could be Lana’s father is no taboo any longer. Much higher age differences have already been booked and silently accepted in the annals and tabloids of the world, as long as there is true, blue love between the pair.

A duet between them would be like Nancy singing with Frank Sinatra. And, there are other synergies, too. I hope this couple could find each other. Together they have that something, don’t they? I think this goes to prove that we should pay closer attention to what people utter and express, especially in the case of human or romantic relationships. Or, someone might say, we might need to be more careful what we wish for.

This Is It.


Arvio: Esitän tällä puheellani konkreettista aihiota siitä, mitä aloite pitää sisällään. Oletan, että edelläni oleva pääministeri puhuu enemmän yleisesti aiheesta, jolloin peesaan häntä mutta konkreettisella tavalla. Jos seuraava tekee saman, hän täydentää sarjan ideaalisti. Jos hän ei keksi mitään tosielämän ihmisiä puheenaiheiksi, hänen on toistettava jotain samaa, kuin mitä pääministeri jo teki. Mutta minä en estä kumpaakaan.

THR the narrative of “the One”

Standard

Week 11


 

Date: Mar 12th, 2019
Motion: THR the narrative of “the One”
Role: MP (gov.)
Pair: Roni (Whip)


In my speech, I’m going to talk about the subject based on a) recent trends spotted among young people and b) masculine experience, as the latter is an experience I am not totally unfamiliar with.

On a Philosophical Critique of “the One”
First of all, I would like to start off with by saying that the premise of “the One” is false. If the One lived on another continent, say in North America, when the Other one was living in Europe, how on Earth could these two connect by availing themselves of the means available to them? My guess is that it would be easy to get to know people and pair off nationally or intracontinentally, but much less so intercontinentally. On the other hand, the (whole) world would comprehend all and each of our love interests. There must not be other kinds of, extra-terrestrial love interests. That’s the human condition on love.

On Behalf of People, Especially Young People
Apps like Tinder defy the idea that there would be “the One”, or Ms. Right or Mr. Right. According to Tinder, there are many, as long as they are pretty and are living within a 50-mile radius from where one resides. Young twenty- and thirtysomethings use apps like Tinder and they influence the way they are thinking about people and relationships.

Apart from Tinder, there are other developments and trends that have reared their heads.

  • Tribalism. According to the core idea of electronic tribalism in a digital age, anyone can be one’s soulmate, as long as that person shares the same values and beliefs. This can be seen in many computer-connected and subcultural groups of youth.
  • Small Circle of Friends. There is a tendency of young people to pair off and befriend each other in a small group of like-minded  and same-age people, with minimal age differences and thought differences. This is a departure from the past. In the past, people were more heterogenous and wanted to spread out.
  • Polyamory. It is not uncommon that some people live in a one-female-and-two-males or a one-male-and-two-females arrangements, which hints off that people are moving away from monogamy to polygamous relationships. This, again, underlines that there might not be a “the One”.

On Behalf of Men
Men’s erotic love spreads around like a peacock’s fanlike tail. Men may fall in love in the streets, sometimes 30 times a day, especially in the summertime. How would this speak for the fact that there would be “the One”? With age and time, men become more secure, but they represent a serious streak of polyamory with this kind of behaviour.

I would say that instead of there being a “the One”, if a man is a serial monogamist, a man needs circa 5 partners, give or take, during his lifetime. A man needs one lover during

  • teenage. This is the denarian love.
  • studies. This is the vicenarian love.
  • early work-life. This is the tricenarian and quadragenarian love.
  • later work-life. This is the quinquagenarian through septuagenarian love.
  • old age. This is the octogenarian through centenarian love.

All of these phases of men require a new Loved One, in the worst or best of cases, since men change with every new phase of their lives they move into. It is highly likely that they may fall out with their loved one, once it becomes clear that both have changed, but in different directions.

This is the reason why we think that the narrative of “the One” is a false one and that it should be regretted.


Kesto: 7 min 3 sek
Arvio: Varsinaisessa väittelytilanteessa loppu tuli ryysittyä läpi, sillä aikaa kului erääseen sivujuonteeseen, jonka sisältöä ei ole tähän oheistettu materiaalin irrelevanssin takia. Näin ollen lopussa ei oikeasti käyty käytännössä läpi ollenkaan 5 elämänvaiheen sisältöä. Tuomari oli sitä mieltä, että sanaa narratiivi olisi pitänyt toistella ja keskittyä aiheeseen nimenomaan sen kautta, mutta en tiedä, mitä iloa on etäännyttää itseään metatasolle sanan narratiivi avulla, kun se kuitenkin viittaa oikeisiin, todellisiin asioihin. Parempi olisi puhua niistä asioista. Odotan kauhulla, milloin tieteiden fysiikka ja kemia kohdallakin aletaan puhua narratiivista. Sanahan on luultavasti perua kirjallisuustieteilijöiltä, ja joskus haluttaisi sulkea se yksinomaan sen tieteen alueelle. Minusta aiheen käsittelyssä riittää, että keskittyy kritisoimaan “yhden ainoan oikean” (elämänkumppanin, platonisen ihastuksen tai kaukorakkauden) käsitettä.